AI Prompts Library

Review this contract before I sign it. I'm the {FREELANCER / CLIENT / EMPLOYEE / VENDOR}. Deal
context: {WHAT'S BEING EXCHANGED + ROUGH VALUE}. My biggest worry: {IF ANY}.
Scan for and explain in plain English:
1. RED FLAGS ranked by severity: unlimited liability, IP assignment broader than the work,
non-compete scope/duration, payment terms beyond 30 days, unilateral termination or change rights, auto-renewal traps, indemnification imbalances, "work for hire" surprises. For each: quote the clause → what it means for ME in one sentence → what it could cost in a realistic scenario.
2. WHAT'S MISSING: protections I'd expect for my side that aren't there (kill fee, late-payment interest, revision limits, liability cap).
3. THE ASKS: for the top 3 issues — the specific replacement wording to request, and the
negotiation line to deliver it ("Standard in my agreements is X — can we align on that?").
4. WALK-AWAY TEST: is anything here a dealbreaker at this deal size, or is it all negotiable
friction?
End with the reminder: you're an AI, not my lawyer — for {HIGH-VALUE / UNUSUAL} deals, a real
lawyer reviews the final version.
CONTRACT: {PASTE}

Write my performance self-assessment. My role: {TITLE}. Review covers: {PERIOD}. My raw material:
{PASTE — messy list of what I did, projects, wins, numbers if I have them, and anything that went sideways}.
Rules:
1. IMPACT LANGUAGE: transform every "I did X" into "I did X, which resulted in Y" — where Y is
money, time, risk, quality or team capability. Where I gave no number, mark {ADD METRIC?} and
suggest what to measure.
2. THE HIERARCHY: lead with the 2–3 things that mattered most to the BUSINESS (not the hardest
work — the highest impact; they're often different).
3. HIDDEN WORK: surface the invisible labor — mentoring, unblocking others, preventing fires,
documentation — framed as impact, because unclaimed work doesn't exist at review time.
4. THE GROWTH SECTION: one real area to improve, framed with evidence I'm already addressing it (never a humble-brag "I work too hard", never a real self-torpedo).
5. FORWARD CASE: 3 sentences connecting this year's evidence to next year's scope — the quiet
promotion argument.
Tone: confident, factual, zero arrogance, zero apology. Length: {FORM'S LIMIT or 400 words}.

Create my client onboarding kit. My service: {WHAT I DO}. Typical project: {SCOPE + DURATION +
PRICE RANGE}. Past pain (be honest): {WHAT HAS GONE WRONG BEFORE — scope creep, slow feedback,
ghosting, endless revisions}.
Deliver:
1. ONBOARDING QUESTIONNAIRE: 10–12 questions that actually shape the work — goals with numbers, decision-maker mapping ("who else approves this?"), taste calibration ("show me 2 examples you love and 1 you hate"), constraints, and the trap-detector question for my specific past pain.
2. KICKOFF CALL AGENDA (45 min): introductions kept short → goals confirmed back to them → process walkthrough with THEIR responsibilities explicit (feedback windows, asset delivery) →
communication rules (channel, response times, meeting cadence) → next 2 weeks concrete → the "how we handle changes" conversation NOW, while everyone's happy.
3. THE EXPECTATIONS EMAIL (sent after kickoff): summarizes decisions, deadlines both ways,
revision policy, and the scope boundary — friendly tone, contractual precision. Under 250 words.
4. RED-FLAG PROTOCOL: the 3 early warning signs from my past pain, and the pre-written
gentle-but-firm message for each.

Transform my raw meeting notes/transcript into an action document.
Output exactly this structure:
TL;DR: 3 bullets max — what this meeting decided.
DECISIONS MADE: numbered, with who has final say if mentioned.
ACTION ITEMS: table — Task | Owner | Deadline | (mark [!] if owner or deadline is MISSING so we can fix it).
OPEN QUESTIONS: things discussed but not resolved.
PARKED: raised but deliberately postponed.
FOLLOW-UP EMAIL: ready-to-send summary to participants, under 120 words, action items first.
Flag anything contradictory in the notes. Do not invent owners or dates that weren't stated.
NOTES:
{PASTE}